看到近来许多投稿过程中遇到的多种问题，我特意将我的一个投稿经历整理完整作为一个典型例子贴出来，希望能够抛砖引玉，给大家一些有益的帮助。各位看后别忘了推荐一下啦。
（1)稿件递交后，过一周左右。语言编辑返回信息如下：
Dear XXXX,
Your submission entitled "" has been received by XXXX. However, before we can proceed with the review process we require you to submit the following item(s), as per the Guide for Authors:
Required item(s): ---------------------------------
This article has passed technical check. However, the author is requested to check for the following:
1) In general, the English is clear. There are some minor mistakes. E.g. "Sample preparation, HPLC ysis, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) ysis, and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) ysis were perform as previously described". Please revise such sentences for grammar and clarity.
2) The list of References should be arranged alphabetically by author's name.
3) Please follow the format with respect to units.
(For more details please check Guides for Authors at: )
-----------------------------------
To resubmit your manuscript, please log onto Elsevier Editorial System as an Author
Your manuscript can be found in the "Submissions Waiting for Author's Approval" folder in the Main Menu. Please click "Edit Submission" to upload the corrected files, and when you are satisfied that the PDF meets the requirements, click "Approve Submission" to submit it again.
If submitting the requested item(s) may take some time, I would be grateful if you could immediately confirm by reply that you will be able to resubmit the complete manuscript within a reasonable time frame.
PLEASE SUBMIT SOURCE FILES WHERE POSSIBLE (e.g. Word).
Thank you for your cooperation. Upon receipt of your resubmitted manuscript we will immediately forward it to the Editor.
Yours sincerely, XXXX Journal Manager XXXXX
(2)花了一个小时，修改后上传了。然后才漫长的稿件送审过程。两个月后审稿意见来了。
Dear XXXX,
I can now inform you that the reviewers and editor have evaluated the manuscript "XXXXX. As you will see from the comments below and on
http://ees.elsevier.com/XXXX/, publication in its present form is not recommended, and major revision is being requested.
Please consider the reviews to see if revision would be feasible. Should you wish to resubmit you should explain how and where each point of the reviewers' comments has been incorporated. For this, use submission item "Revision Notes" when uploading your revision. Also, indicate the changes in an annotated version of the revised manuscript (submission item "Revision, changes marked"). Should you disagree with any part of the reviews, please explain why. To facilitate further review, add line numbers in the text of your manuscript.
Please strictly follow the formatting requirements as presented in the Guide for Authors.
Any new version should be returned within two months, as any resubmittal received after this time may, at the editor's discretion, be considered as a new paper.
To submit a revision, go to
http://ees.elsevier.com/XXXX/ and log in as an author. You will find your submission record under Submission(s) Needing Revision.
When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them.
When resubmitting, please present any figures, tables etc. as separate files. See the Artwork Guidelines on the home page right menu for further file naming conventions, referencing and format issues.
I hope that you will find the comments to be of use to you.
Kind regards,
For the Editor,
XXXXX
Journal Manager
XXXXX
...........................................................
COMMENTS FROM EDITORS AND REVIEWERS
Dear Dr. XXXX,
the reviewing process of your paper is now completed. Both reviewers are in favour of a publication, but request quite a number of changes and additions. I fully agree with this and decided that overall a major revision is needed before publication. Further editorial remarks are:
* The language needs some improvement. Please ask for professional help. Elsevier has no language editing service.
* Please consider in particular the comments no. 2-4 and 6 of reviewer 2 concerning the experimental part. They are essential for a successful revision.
* Line 65 and else in the manuscript: Please always a space between number and unit (e.g. 200 mM, 25 癈).
* Experimental part: Please add the quality of the chemicals.
* Line 107: The HPLC column has to be specified more precisely (pore size, polymeric or monomeric, end-capped etc.).
* Line 136: Please add the electrospray ionisation conditions.
* Line 164 and else: Please no dots between measuring units, just a space.
* Due to international agreements also our journal is obliged to require some quality assurance data which prove the quality and validity of experimental data (e.g. use of reference materials for control, recovery studies, blanks etc.). Please add such information.
* Please use international abbreviations for journals. Please use the ISI list under
http://library.caltech.edu/reference/abbreviations/. No "dots" after full words such as "Chemosphere".
* Please Figure captions on a separate page.
* Please give error bars in figures 2 and 4. I assume that you have not carried out the experiment only once.
* Please do not just connects measuring points in figures 2 and 4, try a curve fitting.
Please list all items you have changed in a reply letter or a separate list. If you disagree with some statements and proposals of the reviewers, please comment on them in a separate letter and give convincing reasons why you could not follow them. Please submit the revised version both in original and with the changes marked.
Please also observe the latest guidelines for preparation of manuscripts for Chemosphere. They are available in the internet under
http://ees.elsevier.com/XXXX/default.asp by clicking on guide for authors.
Please inform us within 10 days from the receipt of the letter, if you will revise the manuscript. Otherwise, it will be erased from our list. We have considerable problems with slowly or not responding authors. To shorten the time between submission and publication, you should send your revised manuscript within 60 days. After this period, it will be considered as a new submission leading to a corresponding delay.
Yours sincerely
Prof.XXXX
Editor XXXX
XXXXX Section
Reviewer #1:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXx
XXXXXXXXXXX
Reviewer #2:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXx
XXXXXXXXXXX
(3) 于是大修了半个多月然后递交修改稿，几天后编辑发信了接受了。
Dear XXXX,
I am pleased to inform you that the manuscript "XXXX" has now been accepted by the editor for publication.
Your manuscript will soon be passed to the production department for further handling. Then you will receive further notice.
Thank you for considering our journal for the publication of your research.
Kind regards,
For the Editor,
XXXX, Journal Manager
XXXX
Comments from the Editor:
Dear authors,
I have received the revised version of the manuscript mentioned above. I am pleased to advise you that it has been accepted for publication in the journal XXXX.
All further information concerning galley proofs, offprint and the copyright forms will be tranitted from the editorial office.
Thank you very much for considering XXXX for publication.
Yours sincerely
Prof. Dr. XXXX
Editor XXXX
(4)剩下的就是签署版权转让与修改Proof了。
